Referring to a tweet of Donald J. Trump on December 9, 2018, 8:38AM:
“On 245 occasions, former FBI Director James Comey told House investigators he didn’t know, didn’t recall, or couldn’t remember things when asked. Opened investigations on 4 Americans (not 2) – didn’t know who signed off and didn’t know Christopher Steele. All lies!”
President Trump. Keepin’ tabs on someone who did/did not say about an ongoing investigation because of classified information? He is the primary subject of your concern because he is the only person to hinder the progress of breaking our country upon your inauguration. Why put loyalty on the table when it is not part of the equation to serve you, the President; could he be part of the justice system: to provide information for Department of Justice to determine if a case of obstruction to justice could be filed for an indictment; and further present to members of U.S. Congress for possible impeachment — on this note, it is too much risk for you not to terminate him as soon as possible after inauguration because after all, he is the one serving our country and to stop extremists, terrorists, separatists, etc. from tearing our country into none united of states in America.
Is it an assumption or could this be proved somehow that the President is part of a planned scheme from extremists, terrorists, separatists, etc. to end the still standing to-date, The Star Spangled Banner to be pulled down with the Confederate flag of the past to rise again. Therefore, would this President and his followers be in contempt of treason to overthrow the government system?
With Justices of Supreme Court, elected U.S. Congressional members watching over the land and people of United States of America, does impeachment require both branches of governance to pass the motion? If that is not the case, the balance of power between three branches of governance are most definitely being attacked or challenged to have any one pillar fail to hold its stance. For example, the President was able to nominate two Justices within first term of presidency, which rarely happens in our country’s recorded history. Furthermore, with the constant turnover of his key personnel in The White House, with no address to the State of Union summarizing his progress and directives for the country, but rather, throwing rally after rally to the states and residents he visited are the only predetermined that has a future with him leading toward a new country?
Thoughts from Arnold 